Crop Management & Environ-mental
Effects on Rice Milling Quality & Yield - 2008
|
|
---|---|
Project Leader and Principal Investigators Randall "Cass" Mutters, farm advisor, UC Cooperative Extension, Butte CountyJames Thompson, extension specialist, Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Enginering, UC Davis Richard Plant, professor, Dept. of Plant Sciences, UC Davis |
This is the sixth year of a project examining how crop management decisions and field moisture conditions affect rice milling quality and yield. This work has significant implications for how rice is harvested and could lead to a reduction in drying costs.
Harvesting at lower moisture contents would allow the rice industry to save money by reducing drying costs. More detail about this research follows. Field and laboratory experimentsA field experiment at RES in 2008 compared M-202, M-205 and
M-206 rice planted in three basins at a seeding rate of 150 pounds/acre.
In controlled laboratory experiments to determine the effect
of moisture exposure on fissuring of Drain time and dew effectsA better understanding of soil moisture content and loss rate
is important to establish appropriate drain times because of the potential
for moisture to influence rice kernel fissuring and thus head
Kernel fissuring can be greatly influenced by dew on panicles. For instance, results from 2007 indicated that M-206 fissured when exposed to more than eight hours of dew. In 2008, leaf wetness sensors were used to refine dew measurements. Indications are that drain time and soil water content may influence the number of dew events. However, in 2008 there were not enough high humidity days to significantly reduce head rice yield, even in the sensitive M-202 variety. Results from 2008 partially confirm results from previous years’ research – that head rice yields of M-205 and M-206 remain stable across a range of harvest moisture contents. In contrast to previous years, however, the head rice yield at different moisture contents in 2008 was not influenced by an early drain time or weather. This was because of the few dew events occurring during the harvest period. In 2008 only four nights of dew were observed at the research site (compared to 12 in 2007). Samples taken adjacent to the statewide variety trials near Colusa and Natomas showed that both M-205 and M-206 produced higher head rice yield compared to M-202 when harvested at low moisture content. When moisture content was above 22 percent, there were no significant differences in head rice yield. The superiority of M-205 and M-206 was clearly evident with moisture content levels below 18 percent. This research shows that the newer varieties may be drained earlier than is current common practice. More information is needed, especially on lighter textured soils, but early draining may allow growers to reduce water requirements for rice crop production in these varieties. |