


Project Leader and Principal UC
Investigators
Donald G. Crosby, professor,
Department of Environmental Toxicology, UC Davis
J.M. McFarland, staff research
associate
S.A. Mabury, graduate research
assistant
J.R. Gever, graduate research assistant
J. Ito, staff research associate
L. Rucoba, undergraduate assistant |
Knowledge of what happens to pesticides used in rice farming
is critical to decisions affecting their management and regulation. Environmental
toxicologists working on this area of research are continually searching for improved
methods of analyzing the factors that affect the fate of pesticides in the environment;
gauging the relative importance of those factors to the practical use of rice pesticides;
and applying their research results toward meeting regulatory requirements and improved
management practices.
Analytical Techniques
In previous work toxicologists established a direct relationship between the rate at
which pesticides break down in field water and their reactivity toward hydroxyl radicals,
-which are created naturally by the action of sunlight on field water. Their next step was
to analyze field water for hydroxyl radicals and also for some of its principal sources.
Using a variety of sophisticated laboratory techniques, the scientists were able to
determine the relative importance of different substances as sources of hydroxyl radicals.
While dissolved iron, copper and hydrogen peroxide all contribute to the natural capacity
of rice field water to degrade pesticides, nitrate (largely from fertilizer) is generally
the most important source of hydroxyl radicals. Another significant but previously
unrecognized source of the degradative agent is the carbonate radical generated from
hydroxyl and dissolved carbonate minerals.
Herbicide Toxicity
Researchers continued their studies of BoleroŽ (thiobencarb) and concerns that this
herbicide may be to blame for severe stunting observed in parts of the Central Valley.
Last year laboratory analysis showed no likely connection between the compound and typical
California rice field soils. In 1993, however, further analysis has led toxicologists to
believe that a breakdown byproduct of thiobencarb may be to blame.
The findings "strongly implicate" a toxic byproduct of thiobenearb as the
cause of injury. Scientists warn that the factors necessary to create further injury exist
in the Central Valley. They also suggest that there may be a connection to straw
incorporation and continuous flooding.
Bluestone
Copper sulfate or "bluestone" is used heavily by rice growers for control of
algae and tadpole shrimp. In 1991 more than 1.5 million pounds of bluestone were applied
to 97,000 acres of rice - roughly 15 pounds per acre, Toxicologists wanted to analyze
where all this copper goes, how much leaves the field in tailwater, how much is added to
the soil, how much of it drifts off-site, and how fast it dissipates from water.
Although small proportions of aerially applied copper were found in adjacent air, soil
and water, 88 percent of the application was found to have precipitated from the water in
solid form within six hours and was thus largely unavailable to control algae and other
aquatic pests. Total copper in 11 Sutter County soils ranged from 15 to 54 ppm and
bioavailable copper from 4 to 10 ppm. Fifty ppm is roughly equivalent to 160 pounds copper
per acre. The researchers now are measuring the effects of these and higher levels of
copper on rice plants.
Microlayer Studies
Previously toxicologists had analyzed the nature of an ultra-thin
"microlayer" of organic liquid found on the surface of rice field water. They
determined that this film is comprised primarily of fats from decaying plants and animals.
Researchers last year developed a "revolutionary" new technique for
collecting microlayer samples with silicone-treated glass plates. The data they collected
showed convincingly that certain "hydrophobic" pesticides have an affinity for
this microlayer. Concentrations of carbofuran (FuradanŽ) reached about 10,000 ppm in the
film, while thiobencarb (BoleroŽ) concentrations were even higher. These pesticides
dissipated more slowly from the microlayer than from subsurface water, although
photodegradation and transfer into water eventually reduced pesticide concentrations.
Novel Sampling Method
Toxicologists also developed a novel method for detecting and measuring fluorine-
containing pesticides, such as diflubenzuron (DimilinŽ), and also their breakdown
products in soil and water. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry - the scanning
technique widely used in hospitals - fits the bill. It requires no extraction or sample
cleanup and recognizes only the fluorinated compounds of interest.
In addition to use in further studies of diflubenzuron fate, the technique also holds
promise for investigation and monitoring of other fluorinated compounds which now
represent 12 percent of all new pesticides. |